Vectors To Final |
Post Reply |
Author | |
SB Jim
Senior Member Joined: 30 Aug 2012 Status: Offline Points: 206 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 12 Sep 2017 at 11:48am |
I did an IPC yesterday which went well. However, it highlighted an ongoing frustration I have with the VTF function.
On both my IFD 540 and CNX 80 activating VTF makes many (most?) of the fixes disappear which is problematic. My CFII tells me that other units now will allow one to activate VTF but the various fixes remain (which is most helpful). Can that be changed on the IFD? Because the bulk of my flying is done in a radar environment I rarely fly a procedure as published. 99% of the time we're getting radar vectors. I've gone to a standard procedure of loading the full approach in both boxes, but extensive vectoring has confused the logic in both boxes on more than one occasion. I understand the fly leg option as well, but I really don't understand why VTF feature can't leave the other fixes in place and allow us to join the approach where ATC places us. This really begs to be fixed. ??? Jim |
|
Ibraham
Senior Member Joined: 21 May 2016 Location: KHWO Status: Offline Points: 363 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
We have both the IFD 440 and Garmin GNS 430, on both units (I believe most others), when you activate VTF, the unit will only display a magenta line to the FAF, all the fixes prior to the FAF will disappear.
Even when being vectored, it is better to load the full approach for situational awareness especially when you have altitude restricted step down fixes. Once given a heading to intercept the final approach course, then activate the leg to the FAF and intercept it.
|
|
Flying_Monkey
Groupie Joined: 27 Mar 2017 Location: CA Status: Offline Points: 70 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
It's annoying for sure and that's why I use activate leg exclusively on the 430W. Gonna be the same drill on the 540
|
|
oskrypuch
Senior Member Joined: 09 Nov 2012 Location: CYFD Status: Offline Points: 3061 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
It is a little different with the IFDs, than the Garmins. You can see both the flight plan and the map at the same time, and it is very quick to swap active procedures and/or active legs/waypoints, you don't have to drill down into menus.
Personally, if I am expecting VTF on an ILS, that is what I will load. If that is changed, it is only a few keystrokes to amend. I prefer to have on the screen precisely what I'm cleared for, or expected to be cleared for. But I can certainly see the general benefit of loading a full approach and activating a given leg for VTF. Certainly that is what I always did on the old GNS. * Orest Edited by oskrypuch - 13 Sep 2017 at 9:30am |
|
SB Jim
Senior Member Joined: 30 Aug 2012 Status: Offline Points: 206 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I understand the Fly Leg procedure.
Honestly it's simply extra work for the PIC that really shouldn't be required. I can see no viable reason for the VTF feature to disable all fixes on the extended final approach course. I can provide numerous real world examples involving vectoring back and forth over the approach course that have given my IFD 540 fits. It's as if those who devised the VTF logic in these boxes haven't been vectored back and forth over final 2 or 3 times on the same approach. Out here it happens. Sometimes it's easier to simply "dumb down" the box and go into ILS mode and fly it the old fashioned way. ATC treats many approaches that way. I dislike losing those fixes. I dislike having to reprogram the box to Fly Leg when I'm being given multiple heading and altitude changes. Can I do it? Of course. Seems like we can make a smarter box, though. That's my request. I understand that as pilots we can do extra work to make up for shortcomings in box programming. Why should we have to do that? |
|
MysticCobra
Senior Member Joined: 29 Jan 2013 Status: Offline Points: 661 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
I'm having trouble envisioning the implementation of your request. Are you proposing that VTF behave just like loading an approach from an IAF...except that VTF includes all possible IAFs and subsequent fixes instead of just picking one IAF? I'm trying to understand what you're asking for that's different from loading an approach and using the activate leg option, and what in your request would save you the "extra work for the PIC that really shouldn't be required" when using the existing load-an-approach-and-fly-leg capability. Seems like no matter what, the box isn't going to automatically understand the vectors ATC is giving you, so either you're going to be deviating from what's loaded in the box or having to go push buttons to update it to match ATC's latest vectors. That's where I'm not following you.
Edited by MysticCobra - 15 Sep 2017 at 6:38am |
|
Speedbird1
Groupie Joined: 16 Mar 2020 Location: New Braunfels Status: Offline Points: 66 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
This happened to me recently. I'd been told to expect vectors to final, was flying a heading of 350 and had VTF loaded up. ATC then told me 'turn right direct AWALT, cleared RNAV 15'. You guessed it, AWALT was not on my IFD. Learning experience. Aside from loading the full approach and activating a leg I don't think you can do much about this.
|
|
Cruiser
Senior Member Joined: 24 Feb 2017 Location: Ohio Status: Offline Points: 139 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Load the full approach, you are using the HDG bug on the autopilot for VTF, when the controller gives you a fix or a waypoint, it will be on the approach course, highlight that box in the loaded approach and then tap D-->, you are done.
|
|
Ibraham
Senior Member Joined: 21 May 2016 Location: KHWO Status: Offline Points: 363 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
If you already have VTF loaded, then reselect and reload the approach, and select the IAF then Direct to the IAF.
|
|
DougW
Newbie Joined: 22 Dec 2019 Location: Grapevine, TX Status: Offline Points: 1 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Gentlemen, perhaps some clarification is in order as to what you are expecting vs what ATC is telling you. ATC (or ATIS) should advise you in time as to which type of approach to expect, and prior to that approach ATC should define what to expect to initiate that approach ... as in Vectors to Final OR Vectors to a (FIX) (DME ARC). Enter the approach accordingly for your direction from the fix (transition). As in the case of Speedbird, shame on that controller. He should have said to "expect radar vectors to AWALT." A friendly call to that facility might be in order so that they can review JO 7110.65 with that controller again. BTW, you can be vectored and cleared to an initial or intermediate fix when within 90 degrees of that fix and the next leg (no greater than 90 degree turn). Putting in all the legs from an initial fix is a great way to keep SA and activate vectors as necessary, though, especially with some mandatory crossing restrictions. Edited by DougW - 12 Apr 2021 at 2:03am |
|
rolfe_tessem
Senior Member Joined: 06 Jan 2012 Location: Massachusetts Status: Offline Points: 190 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I agree with this as the normal technique. The only time I've been thrown a curve was when cleared direct to an IF to begin an approach. If the IF is not one of the IAF, it won't show up in the dropdown menu. Now that I'm aware of this possibility, I'm much more conscious of this when briefing the approach. An example is the ILS 7 at KPVC. ATC will normally clear you to begin the approach at WOMEK. Rolfe |
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |