Avidyne Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Avidyne General > IFD 5 Series & IFD 4 Series Touch Screen GPS/NAV/COM
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Gaps in FPL between STAR and approach
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Gaps in FPL between STAR and approach

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
jhbehrens View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 15 Dec 2012
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 128
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jhbehrens Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Gaps in FPL between STAR and approach
    Posted: 12 Aug 2024 at 8:38am
On recent flights, I have often noticed there was a gap in the flight plan between the same two waypoints, one the termination point of an arrival, and the other the IAF of the connecting departure. Moreover these could not be manually deleted or 'connected' with a softkey press as is often the case.

Some trial and error showed me the way to remove the gap, is to set the same altitude restriction on both waypoints. As soon as there is any difference, this gap is introduced.

In Europe, there are quite a lot of examples where the published altitude restriction on the same waypoint, when in the START and when in the approach, is different. I know that doesn't make a lot of sense, but there you go. As a result of that, a gap is always introduced and can only be removed by tweaking the restrictions manually.

Although I understand the logic behind this heuristic, I believe this is non optimal behaviour, as an unconnectable gap means you need to remember to manually sequence to the second instance of that waypoint when on the leg to the first instance, without any warning or prompt to say this is required.

A better choice would be not to introduce this gap in the first place, or at least have some logic that forced the pilot to acknowledge or act on the gap.

Can this be considered for an upcoming release?



Edited by jhbehrens - 12 Aug 2024 at 8:39am
Back to Top
AviSteve View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2018
Location: Melbourne, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 2271
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AviSteve Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Aug 2024 at 12:02pm
The IFD generates an alert when approaching a Gap In Route, which acts a a prompt to remind you that something needs to be done.
Steve Lindsley
Avidyne Engineering
Back to Top
jhbehrens View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 15 Dec 2012
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 128
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jhbehrens Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Aug 2024 at 10:25am
I understand, I still think you can do better. The IFD doesn't seem to ever do 'at altitude', it's always 'at or above' even if the procedure says 'at'. So if the end of the STAR the IFD says 'Not below FL050' and at the beginning of the Approach the IFD says 'Not below 3800ft' (a real example I had last week landing at EDQM), why introduce the gap? These two values don't conflict.

Edited by jhbehrens - 15 Aug 2024 at 10:42am
Back to Top
AviSteve View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2018
Location: Melbourne, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 2271
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AviSteve Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Aug 2024 at 10:02pm
There are underlying software design reasons for introducing that rule, but I understand what you're saying.  Best I can offer is to say that we'll take it under advisement and see if there's some way we can tweak the design to support it. 
Steve Lindsley
Avidyne Engineering
Back to Top
AdmiralJanesTKirk View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 04 Nov 2024
Location: Kgnv
Status: Offline
Points: 3
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AdmiralJanesTKirk Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Dec 2024 at 9:28am
I have, on several occasions, had the ifd440 fail to sequence from arrival to approach. Even when beyond arrival fixes, there is no way to activate an approach. I've had to use my 430w in #2 spot to fly the approach. It won't even permit visual approaches. 

I'm wondering if this altitude data conflict is the reason... must the gaps be eliminated before an approach can be activated even if you've flown beyond the gap?

Check  kmia-- TTYLR4.TTYLR to 8L


Edited by AdmiralJanesTKirk - 10 Dec 2024 at 9:29am
Back to Top
MysticCobra View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 29 Jan 2013
Status: Offline
Points: 666
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote MysticCobra Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Dec 2024 at 1:33pm
It's not clear from your post whether you are only concerned about the IFD auto-activating the approach, or if you are also unable to manually activate the approach as well.  

Do you get an "Activate Approach" button on the FPL page that you can use to manually activate when you get close enough?
Back to Top
AdmiralJanesTKirk View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 04 Nov 2024
Location: Kgnv
Status: Offline
Points: 3
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AdmiralJanesTKirk Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Dec 2024 at 1:51pm
Exactly!  There is no "Activate Approach" button available... Even if I try to load other approaches... while on approach  :/

Interestingly, this only happens when an arrival is loaded.

Am I missing something? or is the box faulty?


Edited by AdmiralJanesTKirk - 10 Dec 2024 at 1:53pm
Back to Top
AviSteve View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2018
Location: Melbourne, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 2271
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AviSteve Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 Dec 2024 at 11:02pm
It's not a faulty box.  I couldn't find KMIA TTYLR4 anywhere.  Have you got a link to a chart?
Steve Lindsley
Avidyne Engineering
Back to Top
AdmiralJanesTKirk View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 04 Nov 2024
Location: Kgnv
Status: Offline
Points: 3
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AdmiralJanesTKirk Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Yesterday at 5:58am
Ooops. My bad... TTYLR4 is for KPBI/KLNA. At KMIA it is PALMZ2.PALMZ for 8L.

In both cases, with the arrival loaded, sequence to approach does not seem to work.
Back to Top
dmtidler View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2016
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 619
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dmtidler Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 hours 60 minutes ago at 9:19am
Originally posted by AdmiralJanesTKirk AdmiralJanesTKirk wrote:

Ooops. My bad... TTYLR4 is for KPBI/KLNA. At KMIA it is PALMZ2.PALMZ for 8L.

In both cases, with the arrival loaded, sequence to approach does not seem to work.

This is normal gap behavior for the IFD. The “Activate Approach” LSK 4 hook will show up on the FMS FPL tab when the IFD active waypoint is followed by a gap before the approach. On the PALMZ2.PALMZ for 8L arrival, the Activate Approach LSK 4 hook shows up upon crossing COOFS when DHP becomes the IFD active waypoint.

With all FMS’s I have used, some pilot action needs to be taken to get the FMS to navigate to an active waypoint on the other side of a route discontinuity (gap). In the IFD’s case, all “Activate Approach” is gets the IFD active waypoint to cross the gap between the arrival and approach by performing a direct to the first point of the approach (PABOY in the case of KMIA LOC 8L). There are other ways to get the IFD active waypoint to cross the gap without waiting for or using the Activate Approach LSK. For instance, if at any point on the PALMZ2 arrival, ATC instructions are to proceed direct to PABOY, just perform a direct to PABOY on the IFD using the direct to button. The IFD active waypoint is now on the approach side of the gap and the IFD will give proper guidance for the approach. Alternatively, if ATC instructions are to fly an assigned heading to intercept the LOC 8L final approach course while on the arrival, either an Activate Leg to LICEY or a direct to PABOY with a subsequent setting of an OBS course of 092 to PABOY would get the IFD active waypoint on the approach side of the gap with subsequent proper approach guidance. Essentially, the “Activate Approach” LSK is not at all necessary on the IFD like it was on the GNS system.

One last thought on this scenario, if an Activate Leg to LICEY were performed, the IFD will only display the magenta active course line as far back as PABOY; however, the IFD will generate proper CDI guidance for that course if the intercept actually occurs prior to PABOY even though no magenta course is displayed for that area on the IFD map. If after final approach course intercept in this scenario, the aircraft was still outside of PABOY and either a magenta course line was desired outside of PABOY, or the pilot wanted PABOY as the active waypoint; a direct to PABOY could then be performed.


Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.051 seconds.