Avidyne Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Avidyne General > IFD 5 Series & IFD 4 Series Touch Screen GPS/NAV/COM
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - 10.1.1 - still no X-trak (single line)
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

10.1.1 - still no X-trak (single line)
 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
oskrypuch View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Location: CYFD
Status: Offline
Points: 3058 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote oskrypuch Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: 10.1.1 - still no X-trak (single line)
    Posted: 21 Dec 2015 at 12:07pm
I enjoyed having the crosstrack indication on the top line of the 540 right above the map, you could do that in 10.0.3.

It has still not made it back, yet, in 10.1.1. You need to have this datablock adjust to a single line, for it to fit there.

Can you put this on the list for 10.1.2?

* Orest
Back to Top
AviJake View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 26 Mar 2009
Location: Lincoln MA
Status: Offline
Points: 2815 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AviJake Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Dec 2015 at 1:03pm
It's already done and included in Rel 10.2 - just waiting for the cert train to catch up.
Steve Jacobson
sjacobson@avidyne.com
Back to Top
oskrypuch View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Location: CYFD
Status: Offline
Points: 3058 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote oskrypuch Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Dec 2015 at 2:25pm
Oh, very good. 

Perhaps you can't say, but is 10.2 feature/fix frozen, or perhaps even in final software form and in the FAA's hands?

In any case, look forward to a tickler of what is expected in 10.2, at some time in the future.

* Orest
Back to Top
AviJake View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 26 Mar 2009
Location: Lincoln MA
Status: Offline
Points: 2815 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AviJake Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Dec 2015 at 2:26pm
Copy that but it's so juicy, I'm not going to publish that list until the finish line can be reached by a ping pong ball.
Steve Jacobson
sjacobson@avidyne.com
Back to Top
oskrypuch View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Location: CYFD
Status: Offline
Points: 3058 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote oskrypuch Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Dec 2015 at 3:49pm
Originally posted by AviJake AviJake wrote:

Copy that but it's so juicy, I'm not going to publish that list until the finish line can be reached by a ping pong ball.

Well, you've set the bar high! Looking forward to the best GPS/COM getting even better.

* Orest
Back to Top
ddgates View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2011
Location: Deer Valley
Status: Offline
Points: 1100 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ddgates Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Dec 2015 at 5:16pm
Hooray!

Even though I have the same gear, I had the pleasure of flying with Tom yesterday in his Comanche (Piper, yeah I know).  Impressive.

I think that Tom has done the familiarization tour, he may or may not be a superuser but he was able to use the boxes to do some cool stuff.

I look forward to getting facile with my boxes, and exploring the features Avidyne will be pushing out to its users.

Thanks.
David Gates
Back to Top
DavidBunin View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 20 May 2015
Location: Rockwall, TX
Status: Offline
Points: 742 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DavidBunin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Dec 2015 at 6:00pm

Originally posted by AviJake AviJake wrote:

I'm not going to publish that list

But the 10.2.0.0 software is frozen, right?   Anything new being discussed or debated here (whether its features or fixes) should be thought of in terms of 10.2.1.0 (or even 10.3 depending on severity)?

At this point in the process, I would expect that only the FAA themselves are in a position to request changes in 10.2.0.0 (and have any reasonable expectation that such a request might be granted).

David Bunin
Back to Top
AviJake View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 26 Mar 2009
Location: Lincoln MA
Status: Offline
Points: 2815 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AviJake Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Dec 2015 at 6:50pm
Oh yes, it's definitely frozen.   But it can temporarily thaw out during the next few weeks as we get into official test for credit.   There may be small items on the periphery that move in/out for a few more weeks until that test-for-credit testing is done and the FAA has finished their evaluations.

10.2.1 stuff would be bug fixes.

10.3 is already defined and ready to start work on as soon as we get through a few more 10.2 milestones.
Steve Jacobson
sjacobson@avidyne.com
Back to Top
oskrypuch View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Location: CYFD
Status: Offline
Points: 3058 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote oskrypuch Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Dec 2015 at 8:38pm
Originally posted by AviJake AviJake wrote:

....
10.3 is already defined and ready to start work on as soon as we get through a few more 10.2 milestones.

The elfs are busy. Is the Boeing Banana somewhere in there ???

* Orest



Edited by oskrypuch - 21 Dec 2015 at 8:41pm
Back to Top
tony View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 06 Dec 2011
Location: Atlanta
Status: Offline
Points: 466 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote tony Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 Dec 2015 at 6:35am
Its not the Boeing Banana, its the Orest Banana.  It will always be defined that way in my head.  
Back to Top
bellanca1730a View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: 04 Jul 2013
Location: Tampa
Status: Offline
Points: 63 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote bellanca1730a Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 Dec 2015 at 8:21am
+1 (again) on the *Orest* banana.
Sean Andrews
Bellanca Super Viking
Back to Top
DavidBunin View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 20 May 2015
Location: Rockwall, TX
Status: Offline
Points: 742 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DavidBunin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 Dec 2015 at 9:02am

Originally posted by AviJake AviJake wrote:

Oh yes, it's definitely frozen.   But it can temporarily thaw out during the next few weeks as we get into official test for credit...
10.3 is already defined and ready to start work on as soon as we get through a few more 10.2 milestones.

Speaking from experience, this is a tricky time for a software engineer.  Making sure you roll all of the late-incorporation changes that are made to the current project (10.2) into the pending project (10.3).

Otherwise, when 10.3 comes out there are a handful of "solved" problems (from 10.1) that were fixed in 10.2 but come back to life in 10.3.

Or, put another way...

I just want to tell you both good luck.  We're all counting on you.

David Bunin
Back to Top
ddgates View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2011
Location: Deer Valley
Status: Offline
Points: 1100 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ddgates Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 Dec 2015 at 10:37am
Originally posted by DavidBunin DavidBunin wrote:


I just want to tell you both good luck.  We're all counting on you.

David Bunin


+1, and thanks
David Gates
Back to Top
ptlevine View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 06 Aug 2014
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 53 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ptlevine Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Dec 2015 at 10:31am
Has anyone requested the TODs for each crossing restriction to be available as discrete waypoint in the flight plan?
Back to Top
oskrypuch View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Location: CYFD
Status: Offline
Points: 3058 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote oskrypuch Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Dec 2015 at 1:43pm
Originally posted by ptlevine ptlevine wrote:

Has anyone requested the TODs for each crossing restriction to be available as discrete waypoint in the flight plan?

I assume you mean the flightplan listing on the FMS page, with the time and fuel calcs to the TOD all included?

I made that request, some time ago. I don't know if it made the future consideration database, there was never a reply, but Jake does read most every post. IAC, worth tickling that again.

It would be a powerful feature, and it is a normal feature in any FMS.

* Orest



Edited by oskrypuch - 23 Dec 2015 at 1:55pm
Back to Top
AviJake View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 26 Mar 2009
Location: Lincoln MA
Status: Offline
Points: 2815 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AviJake Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 Dec 2015 at 8:17am
Yes, all of those TOD improvements are in the future feature candidate database.   They have a pretty high internal score too.
Steve Jacobson
sjacobson@avidyne.com
Back to Top
oskrypuch View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Location: CYFD
Status: Offline
Points: 3058 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote oskrypuch Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 Dec 2015 at 10:20am
Excellent.

* Orest
Back to Top
khuffine View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: 12 Dec 2015
Location: GSO
Status: Offline
Points: 68 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote khuffine Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 Dec 2015 at 6:30pm
The Orest arc is also great for a single engine out. Keep it north of the airport and make the field, or know you won't make it. Also a 'FIX" page would be great to have to show ABEAM points or Alternates at a glance. The rubber band is great but it does take you off track..abeam point for a midpoint in the flight plan would be something i would use.
Khuffine
Back to Top
oskrypuch View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Location: CYFD
Status: Offline
Points: 3058 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote oskrypuch Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 Dec 2015 at 9:45pm
I've been talking about FIX pages here a while as well. To show some of the new folks what that is ...


"Fix" circles have been drawn in at 10nm & 20nm, centered on KSEA (737 MFD) 


These aren't range rings in the same sense, as the IFD shows centering on OWN SHIP.

The FIX marks that I'm mentioning, and that K comments on, are relative to any waypoint that you  designate! There is a so-called FIX page on the FMS (CDU) to do this. In the pic there are two FIX ranges set, marked with light dashed green circles. Both are centered on KSEA, one to show a 10nm range, and the other 20nm. You can also specify a radial to be drawn in. These markings act like other elements in the display, such as airports, VORs, and will move when the view is scrolled, and will scale as the display scale is changed. In essence you have sketched in additional reference markings on the map. They become part of the map. 

It is an incredibly powerful feature, as it gives instant orientation to destinations, departures (say for complicated SIDs), intermediate navigation help, marking of range to ETOPS airports, or areas to avoid, and so on. And what is shown on the screen, is up to the pilot.

There were originally two FIX pages, there are now six in the latest software on the NGXs. Each FIX page handles one FIX element(s). That can be an airport, nav beacon or any named waypoint. Once a name is filled in, you then specify up to three distance circles to be drawn, and each circle designation can also include a radial to be drawn with it. Setting a 10nm & 20nm circle to your destination airport, with a radial drawn in parallel to the planned runway, is an obvious choice.

A FIX page-like feature for the IFD is just a suggested feature, but Steve has put it on the future feature candidate list, as far as I know.

* Orest




Edited by oskrypuch - 24 Dec 2015 at 9:48pm
Back to Top
oskrypuch View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Location: CYFD
Status: Offline
Points: 3058 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote oskrypuch Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 Dec 2015 at 9:52pm
Also borrowing another Collins/Honeywell feature, I've put in a request for special waypoints, which I believe is also in the database ...


Crossing radials:
JFK190/CYN100

rad/dist:
JFK190/25

5nm before a waypoint (eg. HOPCE) already in the flightplan:
HOPCE/-5

lat/long, N 47.0, W 080.0
N470W0800


* Orest



Edited by oskrypuch - 24 Dec 2015 at 9:55pm
Back to Top
khuffine View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: 12 Dec 2015
Location: GSO
Status: Offline
Points: 68 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote khuffine Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Dec 2015 at 5:31pm
That would be great....Makes you want to be a pilot! 
Khuffine
Back to Top
oskrypuch View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Location: CYFD
Status: Offline
Points: 3058 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote oskrypuch Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Dec 2015 at 5:52pm
Originally posted by khuffine khuffine wrote:

That would be great....Makes you want to be a pilot! 

Hee, Hee.
Back to Top
AzAv8r View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 06 Dec 2011
Location: Arizona
Status: Offline
Points: 154 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AzAv8r Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Dec 2015 at 9:07pm
N470W0800 hurts my head:  presumably you are suggesting an arbitrary (or at least variable to some larger) number of digits, as long as the entered MSD is consistent with the maximum MSD for lat or long.  Is this interpretation correct? 

With N470W0800 that's only +/- 3NM precision (ok, +/- 2 for longitude given the latitude).   I'd think at least one more digit of precision would be necessary to be reasonably useful, and really expect at least two more digits, which would put the precision at about +/- 180' - not nearly as good as WAAS GPS is capable of, but close enough that the outcome would (usually) match your expectation. 
Back to Top
oskrypuch View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Location: CYFD
Status: Offline
Points: 3058 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote oskrypuch Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Dec 2015 at 9:19pm
The lat/long input is taken as precisely that lat/long. No decimals are used after the first. It is not uncommon for flightplans to receive such RNav waypoints, that consist of major lat/long crossings.

So N470W0800 is lat/long, N 47.000000, W 080.000000

In the Honeywell FMC, it always expects those nine digits (seven digits in some builds), with that format. There is no reason that Avidyne couldn't change that.

Honeywell will also accept a five digit format, which is a little mysterious until you understand. These are typically used for oceanic waypoints. They will really make your head hurt.

* Orest

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The ARINC 424 Format is a five-character format consisting of four numbers and one alpha character, in either NNANN or NNNNA format. The first two numbers represent the latitude in whole degrees and the last two numbers are the longitude in whole degrees. If the longitude is greater than 99° the appropriate alpha character is placed between the numbers, otherwise the alpha character is positioned right of the four numbers.


The alpha characters "N", "E", "W", and "S" indicate positions within the northern or southern hemisphere for latitude, and the western or eastern hemisphere for longitude:

"N" = north latitude / west longitude

"E" = north latitude / east longitude

"W"= south latitude / west longitude

"S" = south latitude / east longitude


The FMS Lat/Long Format is a self-explanatory seven-character format (NNANNNA) showing whole LAT/LONG degrees (see example below).

 

OWPT examples of both formats:

LAT/LONG Position:

ARINC 424 Format:

FMS LAT/LONG Format:

52° 00' 00" N 075° 00' 00" W5275N52N075W
75° 00' 00" N 170° 00' 00" W75N7075N170W
50° 00' 00" N 020° 00' 00" E5020E50N020E
50° 00' 00" N 120° 00' 00" E50E2050N120E
52° 00' 00" S 075° 00' 00" W5275W52S075W
52° 00' 00" S 120° 00' 00" W52W2052S120W
60° 00' 00" S 030° 00' 00" E6030S60S030E
60° 00' 00" S 130° 00' 00" E60S3060S130E



Edited by oskrypuch - 29 Dec 2015 at 9:23pm
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.102 seconds.